Close

Articles Posted in Recent Cases

Updated:

City of Dallas v. Trinity East Energy – Texas Supreme Court Refuses City’s Petition on Appeal of $33 million judgment

In 2014 the City of Denton banned drilling of wells within its city limits. In response the Texas Legislature quickly passed HB 40, giving the Texas Railroad Commission exclusive jurisdiction to issue drilling permits within municipalities and allowing cities to regulate oil and gas activity only if their ordinances relate…

Updated:

Federal District Court Addresses Post-Production Costs in Light of Devon v. Sheppard

The federal district court in Pecos, Judge David Counts, issued a memorandum opinion in H.L. Hawkins, Jr., Inc. v. Capitan Energy, Inc., P:22-CV-DC[Hawkins] addressing Hawkins’ claim that Capitan had improperly deducted post-production costs from its royalty. The Court held that the reasoning in the recent Texas Supreme Court case of Devon…

Updated:

Cactus Water Services v. COP Operating — Who Owns Produced Water?

Production of oil and gas is often accompanied by production of water from the same formation. In recent years, water has been injected into wells in the process known as hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking.” Much of the frac water returns with oil and gas during the initial production of the…

Updated:

PBEX v. Dorchester — Adverse Possession of a Non-Operating Working Interest

The Amarillo Court of Appeals recently decided PBEX II, LLC, et al. v. Dorchester Minerals, L.P. et al., addressing an interesting issue on adverse possession of a non-operating working interest. One justice dissented. The Court’s opinion relies on two Texas Supreme Court decisions that were controversial: Natural Gas Pipeline co.…

Updated:

Devon v. Sheppard — A Win for Royalty Owners

Today the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in Devon v. Sheppard, No. 20-0904, again addressing post-production cost deductions from royalties. The Court affirmed the court of appeals’ ruling in favor of the royalty owners. Sheppard leased minerals in the Eagle Ford Shale in 2007, before the first successful well…

Updated:

Railroad Commission v. Apache – The Issue of Standing

Recently the US Supreme Court heard argument in Biden v. Nebraska, in which several states challenge the President’s authority to forgive student loans. Lost in much of the coverage was the administration’s challenge to the states’ standing to bring the case. “Standing” is a difficult concept to get your arms…

Updated:

Van Dyke v. The Navigator Group – Double Fractions and the Presumed Grant Doctrine

  Today the Texas Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Van Dyke v. The Navigator Group, resolving a ten-year dispute over the ownership of royalty interests and $44 million in royalties. In 1924, the Mulkeys conveyed their ranch to White and Tom, with the following reservation: It is understood…

Contact Us