The Amarillo Court of Appeals recently decided PBEX II, LLC, et al. v. Dorchester Minerals, L.P. et al., addressing an interesting issue on adverse possession of a non-operating working interest. One justice dissented. The Court’s opinion relies on two Texas Supreme Court decisions that were controversial: Natural Gas Pipeline co.…
Articles Posted in Recent Cases
Texas Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Appeal of MIPA Case
Today the Texas Supreme Court agreed to hear Ammonite Oil & Gas Corp. v. Railroad Commission of Texas and EOG Resources, an appeal from the Commission’s denial of sixteen applications by Ammonite under the Mineral Interest Pooling Act. I wrote about this case when it was decided against Ammonite by…
EP Energy v. Storey Minerals – a $41 million most-favored-nations clause
EP Energy E&P Co., L.P. v. Storey Minerals, Ltd., 2022 SL 223253 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2022, pet. denied) The Texas Supreme Court recently refused to review the opinion of the San Antonio Court of Appeals in this case, involving construction of a favored nations clause in an oil and gas lease.…
Devon v. Sheppard — A Win for Royalty Owners
Today the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in Devon v. Sheppard, No. 20-0904, again addressing post-production cost deductions from royalties. The Court affirmed the court of appeals’ ruling in favor of the royalty owners. Sheppard leased minerals in the Eagle Ford Shale in 2007, before the first successful well…
Railroad Commission v. Apache – The Issue of Standing
Recently the US Supreme Court heard argument in Biden v. Nebraska, in which several states challenge the President’s authority to forgive student loans. Lost in much of the coverage was the administration’s challenge to the states’ standing to bring the case. “Standing” is a difficult concept to get your arms…
Van Dyke v. The Navigator Group – Double Fractions and the Presumed Grant Doctrine
Today the Texas Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Van Dyke v. The Navigator Group, resolving a ten-year dispute over the ownership of royalty interests and $44 million in royalties. In 1924, the Mulkeys conveyed their ranch to White and Tom, with the following reservation: It is understood…
“whether or not in paying quantities”
Last year the 14th Court of Appeals in Houston issue an opinion that should serve as a warning to mineral owners, Thistle Creek Ranch v. Ironroc Energy Partners, No. 14-20-00347-CV. Thistle Creek sued IronRoc to terminate an oil and gas lease it claimed had expired for lack of production in…
Davis v. JD Minerals: another fixed vs floating royalty dispute
Last month the El Paso Court of Appeals issued its opinion in a long-running dispute over royalties on a section of land in Upton County. Davis et al. v. COG Operating, LLC, et al., No. 08-20-00205-CV. The court addressed several issues, one of which was the construction of a 1939…
Year in Review: Significant Cases and Events
Winter Storm Uri The fallout from the Texas Freeze in February 2021 continues. A year later, UT’s Austin Energy Institute concluded that multiple failures of power plants, gas processing plants, gas storage and distribution facilities, and gas production all contributed to the system failures. ERCOT management was fired; natural gas…
Hahn v. ConocoPhillips — another case on fractional vs. fraction of royalty
Last week the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals issued a decision on a long-running dispute over reservation of a royalty interest in a deed. This is the court’s second opinion in the case. In the court’s first opinion in 2018, the court construed the following royalty reservation: SAVE AND EXCEPT…