In Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd. v. Puig, No. 04-23-00106-CV, the San Antonio Court of Appeals was asked to construe a royalty reservation in a 1960 deed: There is saved, excepted and reserved, in favor of the undersigned, B.A. Puig, Jr., out of the above described property, an undivided one-sixteenth…
Oil and Gas Lawyer Blog
Gill v. Hill — another chapter in due process law in Texas
In Mitchell v. Map Resources, the Texas Supreme Court described the constitutional right of due process as follows: The Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution prevents the government from depriving a person of his or her “property, without due process of law.” U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1;…
Railroad Commission Proposed New Waste Rules
Last month the Railroad Commission published proposed revisions to its rules governing the handling of oilfield waste. This is a comprehensive rewrite of its rules that had not been revised since 1984. The Commission has been working on these revisions for a year. The published proposed rules can be found…
Who can enforce a pipeline burial covenant in an oil and gas lease?
Unitex WI, LLC v. CT Land and Cattle Co., decided by the Amarillo Court of Appeals, petition for review pending in Texas Supreme Court. CT Land and Cattle owns the surface estate of 4,000 acres in Scurry and Kent Counties. The land is subject to an oil and gas lease…
Ben F. Vaughan III — the Passing of a Giant
Graves Dougherty Celebrates the Life of Ben F. Vaughan III Rembrance here. My law partner for 45 years.
Geysers of Injected Wastewater in West Texas
Three scientists with the Department of Earth Sciences at Southern Methodist University have published the results of a study of blowouts of old wells in the Permian Basin caused by injection of produced water. The summary from the study: Wastewater, a byproduct during oil extraction, is generally injected back into…
Ammonite Oil & Gas v. Railroad Commission – Supreme Court opinion on MIPA
Last week the Texas Supreme Court handed down its decision in Ammonite v. Railroad Commission, upholding the Commission’s denial of Ammonite’s MIPA application. Justice Young filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justice Busby. The case has little implication for most mineral owners in Texas but is an important loss for…
The Osage Nation vs. the Wind Farm
Last December a federal court in Oklahoma issued an order in a long-continuing suit between the United States and the Osage Nation, as plaintiffs, and Enel Green Power North America. United States v. Osage Wind, LLC, et al., No. 4:14-cv-00704-JCG-JFJ (US Dist. Ct. N.D. Okla., Dec. 20, 2023) Enel’s subsidiary operates…
Hamilton v. ConocoPhillips – The first appellate opinion on Production Sharing Agreements
In Hamilton v. ConocoPhillips, the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals construed a Production Sharing Agreement – to my knowledge the first appellate court to do so. A Production Sharing Agreement is an agreement between mineral owners and an operator to allow the operator to drill a horizontal well whose lateral…
Update on Opiela v. RRC
Our firm represents the Opielas, who are involved in a dispute with the Railroad Commission and Magnolia Oil & Gas over a horizontal well located partly on the Opielas’ property. The case has made its way from the Commission to the trial court in Travis County, then to the Austin…